Identify deficiencies that may impact IEQ and/or sources of odor concerns. Typically includes the following depending on the nature of concern, but not limited to:
- interview/questionnaire of concern individual(s)
- inspection above drop ceiling (condition of roof deck, pipe insulation, return air plenum)
- inspection of ventilation system (operation of variable air volume box and outdoor air dampers, check controls, measurements of carbon dioxide, temperature and relative humidity, sources near outdoor air intake, measure return and supply air volume, cleanliness of coils, liner and condensate pan)
- inspection of exterior
- inspection below drop ceiling (housekeeping, sink and floor drain traps, signs of past and present moisture concern via visual and/or moisture meter, mold growth, ensure connection of current and capping of abandoned sanitary vents, odorizers, excessive plants and fabric items, identify potential pathways, and measure volatile organic compounds, carbon monoxide, and lighting)
Date(s) of Assessment: August 20, 2026, and September 1, 2026
On August 20, 2026, no visible indications of water intrusion or mold growth were observed at the time of the assessment.
The cabinetry was evaluated using a moisture meter. No elevated moisture levels were identified at the time of the assessment.
The Office of the Environment was initially unable to access the area behind the shelving. The staff member was informed that the Office would coordinate with Building Services (Carpentry) to facilitate access for further evaluation.
On September 1, 2026, Building Services (Carpentry) removed the cabinetry to allow the Office of the Environment to assess the previously inaccessible area.
No visible mold growth or indications of water intrusion were observed on the backside of the cabinetry. However, two insulated water lines serving the adjacent Fan Coil Unit (FCU) were observed to have condensation on their surfaces, indicating that the existing insulation had deteriorated.
On November 6, 2026, the teacher reported that no additional window leaks had been observed since the initial concern was submitted.
Conclusion:
Building Services identified that the classroom window was misaligned which is likely the source of observed water intrusion. The window was realigned to help prevent future water intrusion.
Based on the assessment findings and corrective actions completed, no further environmental remediation was identified as necessary at the time of the assessment.
As a precautionary measure, the Office of the Environment cleaned and disinfected the shelving.
Building Services (Carpentry) disassembled the shelving and cabinetry to provide access to the water lines behind the shelving. A board-approved insulator replaced the compromised pipe insulation. Building Services (Carpentry) subsequently reassembled the cabinetry and shelving.
Building Services identified that the classroom window was misaligned, potentially allowing moisture intrusion. The window was reset into proper alignment.